"Intamacy should be special. Yes, It is inconciderate to display affection publically. You don't know that?"

 

i love my family, and i loved my girlfriend. i see no need to need to repress my effection for them in public.

why is it so bad for other people to know who i love?

 

"Only the woman may not be perverted, may only be in it for the money. So I may feel bad that a woman has to lower herself like that out of neccesity."

 

or perhaps she likes sex aswell? and she wants to deepen the relationship with intemacy? sex is a good bondign tool, face it.

 

"But the men who watch are sick, cause they should be looking for fulfilment from a willing woman who could cure him of his perversion."

 

 

HAHAHAHA....

i've never heard a weaker rebuttal to porn in my life...

you have any idea how much testosteron run through your viens from time to time? you want to know what i makign all those dirty thoughts in your head when you are in puberty? or what makes you get an erection when you see female shapes? boom hormones baby. just liek anture intended.

 

"I don't have an answer for married men who can't keep theeir hands off it."

 

ass in cheating? why that is a breach of trust. but maybe it was a condoned threesome?

 

"it should not be put into laws as it is unnatural for propagation."

 

AH! finally the unnatural arguemnt.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

 

[argument chrashes down].

 

you are aslo admittign now that marriage is simpyl a contract for procreation. and that by making it a neccecarily religious practice means that religions gets contorl over people's lives.

 

"They are already aloud to do what they want. They made it political and there is the problem. I don't mind disagreeing, but don't shove it down out throats. punn intended."

 

you understand you are showing it down their throats right? by saying what they can and cannot do, while heterosexual behavior is so condoned? but you would appear to also wan to ban that... wich would at least make your position consistant....

"Atheists put them in cages."

 

and your evidence for the traders being atheists is?

 

" and now you are writing me back that christians had slaves. But didn't everyone have slaves? Christian and Atheist?"

 

the "white mans burden" comes to mind. white christians have a long history of expressing their feelings of superiority..

the question was not only who had the slaves, but why, and how did they religion or lack thereof help in them justiying it.

undoubtibly there where christians who did it merely for the profit and took good care of their slaves. but there might also have been a slaver who took that passage in numbers a bit to literal.

 

"And the more you answer my posts, the more I think there is an insentive."

 

yes, you pay us in pure lulz.

 

'Is this happening everywhere? Atheists non ending responsies?"

 

as logn as there are people screamign flasehoods, there are people correctign them.

 

'But it is really sick."

 

we have some time to kill, although i must atmid you postign has slightly distracted me.