First off I'd like to say that i really enjoyed reading your post. Made me laugh so hard my tummy hurt ^^

"All religions are from 1."
- So the belief in the greek gods is derived from judeism? Yeah you can trace some similarities in the 3 big religions of christianity, judeism and islam, but not in anything else...

"Dinosaurs are written in the bible."
- Right and by claiming this you can supply a source for it?

Btw the quantum paradox has absolutely NOTHING to do with evolution. I just dont understand how you come to that conclusion. Non sequiter. It does not follow logic.

"Dino footprints with human footprints. Russians just found more."
- Please show us then =)

"Asians are digging up things that should have been near the top."
- Again please show it.

"Atheist archaeologists are walking around with bibles trying to make a name for themselves."
- You gonna blame them for all the failed attempts to find the ark or what?

"Watching maher and dawkins demonstrating to people how NOT to behave as a human."
- You're completely right! We should act like Kent Hovind instead because he's such a role model. Let's all stop paying taxes since it's the right thing to do!

"Evolution=darwinism=marxism=communism=liberalism=progessivism= socialist=democrat. evolution is politics not science."
- Just because you can write complicated words doesn't mean you understand them. Oh and i can do one to

Creationsism=Complete idiots=christians=fundamentalists=muslims=terrorists=9/11
:O look creationism is the reason why the twin towers went down!

"global warming scam is proof Ken was right about the corruption of lies in our whole system, ruled by these so called science loving atheists."
- I've already dealt with this in a previous thread. It's no scam. there's no conspiracy. If you find it difficult to find the info i would gladly give it to you and explain it.

"I can list a hundred reasons for me to believe in a creator."
- Arguments does not equal proof or evidence. Is that so hard to understand? Unless you can test god you can only argue for and against it. A list of 100 reasons for you to believe in a god doesn't make it so if the list is incorrect and based on misinformation or the lack of it. You haven't really given any strong arguments for it just strawmanning the opposite camp to make your thoughts look better.

"We say we believe, you say you know."
- Maybe because we actually source our claims and do the research you fail to do. A decent education helps a lot to ;)

"As soon as you say we have no right to believe by telling us we are idiots just shows how ignorant you really are."
- And who in here said that? You can believe whatever you want, but if you base that belief on stupid things and plain idiocy. We have all right to call you stupid ;)
By pointing out and correcting you with trustworthy data and scientific work for example, we're actually showing you why we thing you're stupid and what the claim is based upon. Now you try!

"As for argueing any of these points with you people, you are going to spout the lies and distortions your philosophy has been putting out there for years like it is science. Each proof you bring will have been filtered the same way the information on global warming was."
- You mean by those people with an avarage of 20 IQ higher than you and 9 years minimum of study at a university in a field of research that you don't even understand the founding principle in? If you hate them so much why do you even use a computer? Or medicine that has been produced with the knowledge found through studying evolution?

"We know no one knows the truth and as such, believing in a creator is a legitimate hypothesis."
- No a legitimate hypothesis is only good if you can test it. Or it would only be an untestable hypothesis with no real value as it wouldn't have no explaining power what so ever.

"It's funny how you folks claim to know so much, and yet the concept of proof seems to escape you. If you can't prove there is no God, you can't mock people who believe. At least on scientific ground. If you mock them then you are an ideolog nothing more."
- Funny how you write that. The concept of proof is that something is not right until it is proven like that. For example a guy who get's busted for drugpossesion will be considered innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. The same thing with god as us rationalists see it. Until there's been any evidence or proof of god we don't believe in his existance since it is highly illogical to belive in it. Just as it's highly illogical to belive that a man did a murder when there's no evidence at all that he'd done it.

"Science my foot."
- GTFO of the internet if you hate science so fucking much!