reasons to believe?
All religions are from 1. Man has proven how undependable he is. The jewish religion is the first and only religion. All other religions are changed variations of the original. Like islam, made up cause the jews had a god. allah was a counter move.
Dinosaurs are written in the bible.
the quantum paradox shows that man needed to be here for any wave to collapse into matter. In other words, evolution can't be true cause we know man could not of been here first. conversely, our creator was here to make everything real, and since we were made in his image(spiritual)..
Dino footprints with human footprints. Russians just found more.
Asians are digging up things that should have been near the top.
Junk dna is becoming necessary information.
Atheist archaeologists are walking around with bibles trying to make a name for themselves.
Watching maher and dawkins demonstrating to people how NOT to behave as a human.
Evolution=darwinism=marxism=communism=liberalism=progessivism=
socialist=democrat. evolution is politics not science.
global warming scam is proof Ken was right about the corruption of lies in our whole system, ruled by these so called science loving atheists.
I can list a hundred reasons for me to believe in a creator. You want to act like the enlightened ones telling us poor ignoramuses how things actually are, problem is, not one scientist can do that in reality. But that is all you people do. We say we believe, you say you know. Who is right in reality? As soon as you say we have no right to believe by telling us we are idiots just shows how ignorant you really are.
The quantum paradox prevents them from proving anything is real and yet they think they have proved God unreal. How that?
As for argueing any of these points with you people, you are going to spout the lies and distortions your philosophy has been putting out there for years like it is science. Each proof you bring will have been filtered the same way the information on global warming was.
We know no one knows the truth and as such, believing in a creator is a legitimate hypothesis. It's funny how you folks claim to know so much, and yet the concept of proof seems to escape you. If you can't prove there is no God, you can't mock people who believe. At least on scientific ground. If you mock them then you are an ideolog nothing more. Science my foot.
