Home > Content > General > Discussion: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
28 Comments - 3430 Views
Submitted By DrWorm on 10/01/24
FreeHovind, DrWorm, General 

I would go with creationists.  At least a bag of rocks has the virtue of remaining silent.

  1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
    1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
      1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
      2. (by DrWorm on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
        1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
          1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
            1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
              1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  1. » Close» Reply to Comment
                    Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                    2 days - 2,415v
                    Posted 2010/03/10 - 22:44 GMT
                    "Evolution is as unprovable as God. When you look at a piece of evidence. What you see depends on what you want to see."
                    - The fact that there actually is evidence for evolution makes it a much stronger case than the "god-option" that you advocate. Try me wrong, give us a good old evidence for god.

                    "If you have all Atheists searching, then they'll say it helps their cause no matter what. "
                    - You do realize that we can supply you with a list of all christian scientists who through their work have supplied more bits to the great puzzle that is life?

                    "That's why we should get creationists funding so they can give their side for people to decide. "
                    - They don't do any research with funding. What do you think is the purpose of ICR? In all their years of existence they haven't made a single scientific paper. Now how the hell are they suppose to show that they're right if they can't even bring any material to a scientific debate?

                    "We only get filtered data put for as facts that are only assumptions. "
                    - Why don't you try to actually test it? You could easily replicate an experiment on procaryotic antibiotic resistancy.

                    "That's why they have to keep changing what has been debunked."
                    - Care to show us something that's debunked by creation "science"?

                    "I mean you hear that there are so many missing links, that they are all really missing links, because the change is too slow to see. That's the science they say."
                    - In fact all fossils are missing links, have you seen a fossil? =)

                    "Everything is unchanging, then boom, we have many."
                    - You do get natural selection do you? Cuz you don't seem to get punctuated equilibrium. If there's no pressure for selection it's just hardy-weinberg rules that apply. Random reproduction, genetic drift etc. Nothing that puts pressure on the population to change. How is that so hard to understand?

                    "He gets applauded and not one said he was stupid for saying there are no transition fossils. Conclusion. Evolution is an hypothesis Atheist try to hide as scientific fact."
                    - You haven't proven anything by fighting a strawman.
                2. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                3. (by doctorofscience on 10/02/03)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  2. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                    1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                    2. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                      1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                    3. (by F-19HORNET on 10/01/24)Re: Creationists are smarter!
                      1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Creationists are smarter!
                        1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Creationists are smarter!
                      2. (by DrWorm on 10/01/31)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                        1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                          1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                            1. (by DrWorm on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                              1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                          2. (by mwolf on 10/03/10)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                            1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/10)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?


                            This website is powered by Plexpedia
                            Usage of this site constitutes agreement to the » Legal Stuff