Home > Content > General > Discussion: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
28 Comments - 3439 Views
Submitted By DrWorm on 10/01/24
FreeHovind, DrWorm, General 

I would go with creationists.  At least a bag of rocks has the virtue of remaining silent.

  1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
    1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
      1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
      2. (by DrWorm on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
        1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
          1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
            1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
              1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  1. (by Ellman on 10/03/10)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                2. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  » Close» Reply to Comment
                  Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  3 days - 4,501v
                  Posted 2010/02/03 - 19:47 GMT
                  Remember, Evolution, just like creationism, is a theory, and neither has been proven.
                   
                  Evolution is a theory in the strictly-defined sense of a scientific theory. Creationism is only a theory in the colloquial sense, where "theory" is used interchangeably with "supposition" (or, increasingly, as a synonym for "opinion").
                   
                  They are not equivalent, except in the sense that different defitions of the word "theory" could be applied to both concepts.
                  1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                  2. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                    1. (by thedude on 10/01/24)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                    2. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                      1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                    3. (by F-19HORNET on 10/01/24)Re: Creationists are smarter!
                      1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/01/24)Re: Creationists are smarter!
                        1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Creationists are smarter!
                      2. (by DrWorm on 10/01/31)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                        1. (by mwolf on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                          1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                            1. (by DrWorm on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                              1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/08)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                          2. (by mwolf on 10/03/10)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?
                            1. (by thebiblewascompiledin325AD on 10/03/10)Re: Who is dumber. Creationists or a bag of rocks?


                            This website is powered by Plexpedia
                            Usage of this site constitutes agreement to the » Legal Stuff