FreeHovind - Did We Come From Maggot-Like-Creatures?

Did We Come From Maggot-Like-Creatures?

18 Comments - 3627 Views

Fossil of Rare Armor-Plated Worm-Like Creature Discovered in Canada's Capital.

Submitted By ronnie(l.a.) on 10/07/05

FreeHovind, ronnie(l.a.), Creation and Evolution

If the bigbang really happened then weren't the first creatures that came aliv bugs worms or some type of insect creature? did we come from these?

http://www.besse.at/sms/evolutn.html

» Reply to Discussion Threaded Hybrid Flat 18 Replies

ronnie(l.a.)

1 day - 2,617v

Posted 2010/07/05 - 4:54 GMT

now did we come from thes worm like creatures? another site i found "http://www.besse.at/sms/evolutn.html"
says that flat worms and other other worms were the first living things. so we must have come from these crawly creatures right?

And since u guys r so smart; can u tell me the beginning to the end of what the first ancestor from the big bang to man looked like?

thebiblewascompiledin325AD

5 days - 8,032v

Posted 2010/07/05 - 10:18 GMT

mmm ronnie,

i would have expected sci to do somehting like this.

you know....post pages from a parody book and then wait for you to think they are actually real....

that site displays paragrahps from the book;

Science Made Stupid: How to Discomprehend the World Around Us

by Tom Weller

"And since u guys r so smart; can u tell me the beginning to the end of what the first ancestor from the big bang to man looked like?'

no, but we can give you a explination of the ever increasing collection of snapshots (fossils) we have. and then combine that with comparative genome sequencing from all living organisms today.

ronnie(l.a.)

1 day - 2,617v

Posted 2010/07/05 - 23:20 GMT

so if these flat worms were the first living creatures did all the living creatures come from them?

thebiblewascompiledin325AD

5 days - 8,032v

Posted 2010/07/05 - 23:52 GMT

"so if these flat worms were the first living creatures"

but they were not.

"did all the living creatures come from them?"

well all annelid worms ARE decended from annelid worms.

but the article sais only 8 species of this worm are known, so most likely many offshoots that evolved were dead ends.

but have you forgotten that you have no right to assume

"hese flat worms were the first living creatures"

when your source isn't even authorative? or do you just not care?

ronnie(l.a.)

1 day - 2,617v

Posted 2010/07/06 - 18:38 GMT

well if we came from some type of big bang then wasn't it some type of crawling worm or bug that came alive first?

ronnie(l.a.)

1 day - 2,617v

Posted 2010/07/08 - 18:17 GMT

i'm surprised at u guys. why won't u answer my question? well if we came from some type of big bang then wasn't it some type of crawling worm or bug that came alive first?

thebiblewascompiledin325AD

5 days - 8,032v

Posted 2010/07/08 - 22:22 GMT

"why won't u answer my question?"

1) because you probably won't care for the answer anyway.

2) because the question already displays you know nothing of the subject and therefor you are asking the WRONG question. (you seem to be incapable to distinguish, big bang cosmology, form abiogenesis or the evolution of life.

thebiblewascompiledin325AD

5 days - 8,032v

Posted 2010/07/08 - 22:19 GMT

"well if we came from some type of big bang then wasn't it some type of crawling worm or bug that came alive first?"

we did not come from a big bang, we came form our parents.

NOTHING came from big bang, in the sense that is came into existance, the energy was already there.

"wasn't it some type of crawling worm or bug that came alive first?"

bugs are already quite far removed in the evolutionary tree.

and worms make up several other phyla next to the chordates.

did one of our ancestors long ago look like a worm? probably. did it crawl? no, chordates evolved in water, so it swam, and the ancestors before that might have even glided...

did it look like a bug, no. since bugs (insects) are already much later than the "worm" stage.

btw, worms are NOT BUGS (in the sence of insects, maggots or catipillors). (don't act they are on the same level)

and before our "wormlike" ancestor there were several millions of generations of OTHER ancestors, including the eucaryotes that evolved a symbiosis with mitochondria.

answered enough?

ronnie(l.a.)

1 day - 2,617v

Posted 2010/07/09 - 5:05 GMT

so we come from swimming worm-like-creatures?

thebiblewascompiledin325AD

5 days - 8,032v

Posted 2010/07/09 - 10:58 GMT

"so we come from swimming worm-like-creatures?"

us and all other chordates, and probably lots more phyla.

Sci Borg (doctorofscience)

3 days - 4,501v

Posted 2010/07/12 - 5:31 GMT

so we come from swimming worm-like-creatures?

A better question is: why are you so obsessed with worms, and one particular stage of evolution?

Sci Borg (doctorofscience)

3 days - 4,501v

Posted 2010/07/12 - 5:23 GMT

well if we came from some type of big bang then wasn't it some type of crawling worm or bug that came alive first?

And this, ladies and gentleman, is why people who dropped out in the 1st grade shouldn't be allowed to homeschool their children.

Sci Borg (doctorofscience)

3 days - 4,501v

Posted 2010/07/12 - 5:10 GMT

so if these flat worms were the first living creatures

Bzzzt, FAIL.

Try again, please.

Sci Borg (doctorofscience)

3 days - 4,501v

Posted 2010/07/12 - 5:08 GMT

And since u guys r so smart; can u tell me the beginning to the end of what the first ancestor from the big bang to man looked like?

I'm having a hard time deciding what's more ridiculous - the idiotic question, or the idiotic way that you expressed it.

Sci Borg (doctorofscience)

3 days - 4,501v

Posted 2010/07/12 - 5:00 GMT

If the bigbang really happened then weren't the first creatures that came aliv bugs worms or some type of insect creature?

Is that a joke, or are you really that much of a moron?

http://www.besse.at/sms/evolutn.html

"Science made stupid"? Sadly, even that obvious parody is still closer to being accurate than anything you've ever posted here.

ronnie(l.a.)

1 day - 2,617v

Posted 2010/08/06 - 4:21 GMT

Evolutionists will try to lead you into endless debate, and they will more often than not succeed! They will always, almost without exception, get the last word. They will be relentless. This is all part of getting you to waste your time, which the spiritual enemy just loves to see you do (the evolutionist person does not necessarily love that they waste your time, many are probably unaware of the demonic influence on them).Evolutionists believe what they do despite any evidence presented to them. They are firmly committed to a worldview that removes accountability. Without exception, I have found that the committed evolutionist activist is always, I mean always, socially liberal. This ubiquitous connection overwhelmingly establishes the fact that you will likely never convince them, because it is not evidence but worldview that drives them; they simply do not want to be convinced"

Sci Borg (doctorofscience)

3 days - 4,501v

Posted 2010/08/09 - 19:19 GMT

Evolutionists will try to lead you into endless debate, and they will more often than not succeed!

Awesome, we win again.

Molecular Biology kicks creationists ass (Ellman)

2 days - 2,415v

Posted 2010/08/10 - 21:47 GMT

ronnie like's to concede cuz he can't win.

» Reply to Discussion Threaded Hybrid Flat 18 Replies