Amazingly, Kent could not debate when it mattered most as 12 people found guilty. And he continues to lose these debates in the courts.

 

Oh, and Kent is so proud he can debate three people at once, yet despises pride in people.

it´s amazing how hovind manages to so completely and uttelry embaress himself in the eyes of 3 professors....does the man know no shame?

 

i´ve seen this debate before and hovind his ignorance on the subject is blatant. i love how in the end the 1 of the professors actually speaks out against speaks to the odience and tells them to ¨not take teqachign from him, but look up the subject themselves and read the collage books ¨

(paraphrased).

this is a bit like the thunderfoot & Ray comfort with the big gap between intellects. 1 side does it clean reasonable and scientific while the other side just follows flawed thinking. Like a math professor trying to teach a 12 year old how standard deviation works...

I prefer this debate, which demonstrates that Hovind can't even hold his own against other Creationists:

 

 

 

Ross' brand of creationism boils down to "I belive in creationism, except in the one field that I'm actually knowledgeable on (astronomy)" - but he still makes Hovind look like an intellectually-desperate simpleton by comparison.

 

It's hard to pick the best part. The bit where Ross tries to give Hovind a scientific paper he authored, and Hovind dismisses it with "so what, I've got paper too"? Or the part where the moderator AND the audience turn on Hovind, telling him to grow up and stop flinging around the "heretic" label? I just can't choose.