Home > Content > General > Discussion: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
12 Comments - 463 Views
Archaeology backs the Bible.
Submitted By ronnie(l.a.) on 10/02/26
FreeHovind, ronnie(l.a.), General 

Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story

By Nir Hasson, Haaretz Correspondent

Tags: Israel archeology






A team of Israeli archaeologists has announced the discovery of a massive wall they say dates to the 10th century BCE in Jerusalem's Ophel Park on the slope between the Temple Mount and the village of Silwan. The dig director, Dr. Eilat Mazar, dates the wall according to potsherds found nearby to the period of King Solomon and the major period of construction in Jerusalem in the First Temple period, as described in the Bible.

The dig is a joint project by the Hebrew University, the Israel Antiquities Authority and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority.

Along with the wall, which is 10 meters high and 70 meters long, other structures were found, including a monumental gatehouse and a tower. According to Mazar, the wall is additional proof of the accuracy of the Bible's description of the grandeur of the period of David and Solomon.
Advertisement

According to 1 Kings 3:1, Solomon brought his royal Egyptian wife "into the city of David, until he had made an end of building his own house, and the house of the Lord, and the wall of Jerusalem round about."

"If we take the type of building and the finds and examine them in the light of what we know from the Bible, it certainly goes together well," Mazar says. "It suits the biblical story and upgrades our ability to propose an association to the wall of Jerusalem that King Solomon built. It's not wise to relate to archaeology without the biblical text. It is very possible that the Bible, like stories of dynasties, preserves a kernel of truth," she says.

The artifacts found near the wall are seen as further proof of its construction during the Israelite period. An inscription found on a fragment of a jug reads "of the overseer of the ba...", which Mazar believes refers to the "overseer of the bakers." Other fragments bear the words "of the king." Clay seals were also found bearing dozens of names.

According to Mazar, the wall, which has been uncovered over the past few months, was built on a very high level in terms of construction and engineering, and was perched on the natural rock scarp in a way that protected the Temple Mount from the east.

"This is the first time a structure has been found that could conform to descriptions of King Solomon's construction in Jerusalem," Mazar says.

The discovery highlights an ongoing scholarly controversy about the nature of the period of David and Solomon. Mazar belongs to a school of thought that finds archaeological underpinnings to the biblical stories and accepts the stories as historical. Other scholars, many from Tel Aviv University, say the Bible represents myths and the political interests of its writers, arguing that the monarchy of David and Solomon was not the regional power the Bible describes. Critics of Mazar, who asked not to be named, said yesterday they very much doubted the accuracy of her connections between the archaeological finds and the Bible. "She often fires an arrow and then marks the target. What she's telling is a myth," a skeptic said.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1151695.html

» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
10 hours - 490v
Posted Feb 26th - 14:17 GMT
And there is the Mount Olympus which is in the stories of the Greek gods and  goddesses. As does Rome with the Roman gods and goddess and London, England does with Harry Potter.
 
That is what they are, stories.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
23 hours - 1,586v
Posted Feb 26th - 19:35 GMT
the difference is many archaeologists refer to the Bible stories as true stories in contrast wit the greek gods.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
3 days - 3,795v
Posted Feb 27th - 19:54 GMT
the difference is many archaeologists refer to the Bible stories as true stories in contrast wit the greek gods.
 
There are a few historical events mentioned in the Bible that have been verified by historians. Of course, that doesn't mean that any of the supernatural fairy tales in the Bible have been verified - especially since many of them are fundamentally impossible, like Jonah being swallowed by a whale.
 
As historicity goes, the Bible is probably about on par with the Iliad and the Odyssey.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
14 hours - 516v
Posted Mar 8th - 1:19 GMT
No, but you guys loose ground the more we dig. We keep hearing the Bible's wrong. Then digging up, the Bible's right stuff. But like extiction. they want to call it extinct before they know. To say there is something that is in the Bible and but never really was, is not anything more than a lie, yes, I am calling any atheist a liar who thinks the Bible is false because of what we didn't find. Because at best they don't know until they find it. Hell maybe there was a local catastrophy and we'll never find it. You still need to maintain agnosticism at best. These guys are plain and simple, hostile to the Bible which has more credibilty than any ancient atheist book. oh, there ain't none. But they sure act like they are so honest and have the truth for the world. I would place my eternal life on those scribes integrity any day, then the like of these mean children here.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
5 days - 7,615v
Posted Mar 8th - 2:58 GMT
"We keep hearing the Bible's wrong."
 
no, KERNEL.
even sci will agree to that.
 
"But like extiction. they want to call it extinct before they know."
 
..what part about forming temporary conclusions on limited evidence is so hard to understand?
 
". To say there is something that is in the Bible and but never really was, is not anything more than a lie, yes, I am calling any atheist a liar who thinks the Bible is false because of what we didn't find."
 
global flood? no global flood evidence, then that story isn't literal.
simple as that.
 
"Hell maybe there was a local catastrophy and we'll never find it."
 
it i'll have to be prety big to whipe out evidence of a global flood, perhaps a global fire?
 
"You still need to maintain agnosticism at best"
 
or you be an agnostic atheist like me.
or well...most atheists are a tad agnostic when it comes to the most
nebulas definition of god.
 
". These guys are plain and simple, hostile to the Bible which has more credibilty than any ancient atheist book."
 
sicne when are we only dealing with religious texts (by your reasoning)? how about bello gallico? how about plato? how about vergil?
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
5 days - 7,615v
Posted Feb 28th - 15:16 GMT
"the difference is many archaeologists refer to the Bible stories as true stories in contrast wit the greek gods."
 
riiight now lets look at the text.
 
"It's not wise to relate to archaeology without the biblical text. It is very possible that the Bible, like stories of dynasties, preserves a kernel of truth," she says."
 
oooh, isn't that a nice burn.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
14 hours - 516v
Posted Mar 5th - 23:41 GMT
kernal of truth. Like your nickname? wow. I didn't know of this yet. Got some reading to do. hehe. Why does all this real evidence make us happy and you guys sad? Don't you want to know the truth?
 
Stop bashing fellas.
 
stop saying the Bible is a fairy tale when you don't know.
 
Jesus is real history, Atheist lost that battle long ago. Only these die hards keep saying those made up stories bashing Jesus. Those were the lies.
They lie and then lie, telling you they don't lie.
 
 
You are argueing with the dirt now. lol
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
5 days - 7,615v
Posted Mar 6th - 9:01 GMT
"hehe. Why does all this real evidence make us happy and you guys sad?"
 
HAHAHAHA!
the very thought of data makign me sad is entertaining....
no actually i love to learn more, if i'm wrong, i correct myself.
of course....you still have to prove your point. which is the problem here.
 
in in this case, it was horribly unconvincing.
 
"stop saying the Bible is a fairy tale when you don't know."
 
...come on....you can't seriously read genesis and think that's a historical account do you?
garden of eden? flood?
 
"Jesus is real history, Atheist lost that battle long ago."
 
actually that battle is still raging, ask your nearest history professor.
 
 
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
3 days - 3,795v
Posted Mar 6th - 18:05 GMT
kernal of truth. Like your nickname? wow. I didn't know of this yet. Got some reading to do. hehe.
 
In other words, you have to go find some more Christian apologetics websites to copy-paste from.
 
Why does all this real evidence make us happy and you guys sad? Don't you want to know the truth?
 
Sure we do. But unlike Christian "science," it's actually an honest search - we don't start from the conclusion and then look for evidence & excuses to prop it up.
 
Stop bashing fellas.
 
And more hypocrisy from Mikey. Try practicing what you preach for once.
 
stop saying the Bible is a fairy tale when you don't know.
 
Sorry, Mikey, but the Biblical account doesn't get special treatment just because you want it to. Most of the *important* stuff in the Bible (the supernatural elements) have never been verified, there's not even a single shred of evidence for any of it.
 
Take out the crazy fairy tale BS and what's left? A genealogical record, that's about it.
 
In other words, you fail at reason.
 
Jesus is real history, Atheist lost that battle long ago.
 
Bullshit. The only evidence you have that Jesus ever existed is the Josephus account - and the portion that mentions Jesus was almost certainly added years later:
 
 
They lie and then lie, telling you they don't lie.
 
Hypocrisy noted.
 
I almost have to admire your audaucity, most people wouldn't be shameless enough to accuse others of lying after having yourself displayed a nearly-pathological compulsion to lie.
 
You are argueing with the dirt now. lol
 
Comparing yourself to dirt, that's an... interesting tactic.
 
And I see you still haven't figured out that "lol" isn't punctuation.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
5 days - 7,615v
Posted Mar 7th - 12:24 GMT
"Take out the crazy fairy tale BS and what's left? A genealogical record, that's about it"
 
+ a fairly good oversight of the scial norms at the time.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
14 hours - 516v
Posted Mar 8th - 1:05 GMT
no, I am afraid to let you know, the jewish people are beyond contestation as far as I am concerned. Cause if the Bible is true, the jews would be the ones to trust, just like God knew. therest of the world are the liars not the jews. They have the original. So they take the word corrupted Romans when they want to over the words of these men who spent their lives preserving the word they truley thought was the word of God. That's enough for me. And if we put the text at 1000 BC(before Christ), makes it even more undeniable. They were the first to bring us god's story.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Archaeologist finds Jerusalem wall matching biblical story
5 days - 7,615v
Posted Mar 8th - 2:51 GMT
"no, I am afraid to let you know, the jewish people are beyond contestation as far as I am concerned. Cause if the Bible is true, the jews would be the ones to trust, just like God knew. therest of the world are the liars not the jews. They have the original. So they take the word corrupted Romans when they want to over the words of these men who spent their lives preserving the word they truley thought was the word of God. That's enough for me. And if we put the text at 1000 BC(before Christ), makes it even more undeniable. They were the first to bring us god's story."
 
so basically you op to use only the OT and toss out the NT. since that all is "So they take the word corrupted Romans when they want to over the words of these men who spent their lives preserving the word they truley thought was the word of God."?
 
also the texts is barely coherent.


This website is powered by Plexpedia
Usage of this site constitutes agreement to the » Legal Stuff