Home > Content > General > Discussion: You mom's face
You mom's face
8 Comments - 1978 Views
Submitted By physicist on 09/07/19
FreeHovind, physicist, General 

I believe she is dead sir....everyone is dead:(  Where did you all go?  PCS has fallen from youtube and now free hovind is gone...whatever shall I do with my life?

» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
54 minutes - 56v
Posted 2009/07/21 - 18:28 GMT
Evolutionists win...even though we've always won and been winning.
» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
2 days - 3,026v
Posted 2009/07/26 - 21:33 GMT
Wow, your delusional old chap. Neverminding the fact that I have not lost interest.
 
We do not argue colors with the blind, nor is it wise to argue with someone who believes they are related to apes.
» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
5 days - 8,032v
Posted 2009/07/27 - 0:04 GMT
"someone who believes they are related to apes."
 
9tails.
i think you should get this trough your skull for once.
this is what taxanomist have agreed on.
 
 
it's not that bloody hard.
 
"Wow, your delusional old chap. Neverminding the fact that I have not lost interest."
 
WOW>
again it seems the supporting evidence seems to be posten in the font colour "white".
 
"We do not argue colors with the blind"
...in this situation YOU are the blind, since you lack even the most basic understanding of biology.
and we know that because...
you do not understand ecology,
you do not understand even the basics of evolutionary theory.
you do not even udnerstand the basics of genetics and why they are important in determining relatedness, or likeness.
» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
2 days - 3,026v
Posted 2009/07/27 - 12:08 GMT
YAWN ...
 
Frankly speaking, sir, I know what the taxonomists "agree" on (and they don't all agree, just the evolutionist community), and I don't care, because I believe they are wrong.
 
As for the rest of your presumptuous accusations, again, you are wrong.
 
Just because you have taken a special interest in the exclusive belief, doesn't inherently make it some sacred truth.
» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
5 days - 8,032v
Posted 2009/07/27 - 15:03 GMT
"and I don't care, because I believe they are wrong."
 
even if you belive that, it doesn't make it true, and it doesn't give you the right to spread misinformation.
 
"(and they don't all agree, just the evolutionist community)"
 
name me 1 taxonomist who doesn't accept ToE.
 
oh, and, CLADISTICS.
 
"Just because you have taken a special interest in the exclusive belief, doesn't inherently make it some sacred truth."
 
...sigh....
the difference is I can back it up with research done by thousands of scientist.
 
all you got is bible scolars, and scientific illiterates.
» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
3 days - 4,501v
Posted 2009/07/27 - 16:02 GMT
I know what the taxonomists "agree" on (and they don't all agree, just the evolutionist community)
 
Face ---> palm.
 
Here's a little video that you might want to watch:
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
5 days - 8,032v
Posted 2009/07/27 - 16:37 GMT
watch this aswell, especially the summation at 8:00
 
 
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: You mom's face
3 days - 4,501v
Posted 2009/07/27 - 16:03 GMT
We do not argue colors with the blind, nor is it wise to argue with someone who believes they are related to apes.
 
Except that what you're doing is the equivalent of the blind lecturing on colour theory.


This website is powered by Plexpedia
Usage of this site constitutes agreement to the » Legal Stuff