Home > Content > Creation and Evolution > Discussion: Hovind got a mention on WND
Hovind got a mention on WND
3 Comments - 1242 Views
Submitted By ben on 09/06/02
Hovind, is, a, ninny 

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98757
 
 

» Reply to Comment
Re: Hovind got a mention on WND
5 days - 8,032v
Posted 2009/06/02 - 21:56 GMT
dam man, some of the stuff eric sais scares the crap out of me.
 

"Eric Hovind contends the government completely misrepresented his parents in the 2006 trial, portraying them as anti-government radicals.

"Because that picture was never corrected, I can understand why the jury came back with a guilty verdict," he said."


does he REALLY think that juries are that stupid?

but even so, some of hovind points WERE regarding a govenrment conspiricy. NWO trying to shrink the human population any1?

"

Eric Hovind said his mother is "a duck out of water" in prison, even among the Christians there, as a woman who has remained faithful to her husband and "never gone out and partied."

"She wouldn't obviously desire this, but she understands God works everything for good," he said. "We understand that God's hand is sovereign and perfect. And while we don't understand, we will trust his hand. And we will walk by faith, 'OK, God, how do you want to get glory out of me today? I don't get this, I don't understand this, but, OK, you get glory somehow.""


or in other words...doesn't matter if you're completely ignorant on something, just dive straight in witht he word "god" on your lips and you should be fine.....

how bloody crazy is that?

"Eric Hovind said his father is "very, very anxious to get out" but has remained "amazingly strong" and is doing a lot of writing"


and yet nothing to any scientific journals...i wonder why...


» Reply to Comment
Re: Hovind got a mention on WND
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2009/06/03 - 0:06 GMT
hmm, yeah think about how Eric got brought up and fostered by Kent. Not even giving Eric a chance to get a mind of his own.

I do like the list that article linked tho.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answers/topic/arguments-we-dont-use
A list of arguments that should never be used by creationists.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Hovind got a mention on WND
5 days - 8,032v
Posted 2009/06/03 - 8:28 GMT
HAHAHA this is epic
 
Arguments that should never be used
  1. Moon dust thickness proves a young moon.
  2. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics began at the Fall. (If so, how could Adam and Eve have eaten and digested their food that they were told to eat before the Fall?)
  3. NASA computers, in calculating the positions of planets, found a missing day and 40 minutes, proving Joshua’s “long day” (Joshua 10) and Hezekiah’s sundial movement (2 Kings 20).
  4. There are no beneficial mutations.
  5. Darwin recanted on his deathbed.
  6. Woolly mammoths were flash frozen during the Flood catastrophe.
  7. If we evolved from apes, apes shouldn’t exist today. (In an evolutionary worldview, mankind did not evolve from apes but from an apelike ancestor, from which both humans and apes of today supposedly evolved.)
  8. No new species have been produced.
  9. Ron Wyatt has found much archeological proof of the Bible.
Arguments that should be avoided (because further research is still needed, new research has invalided aspects of it, or biblical implications may discount it)
  1. Evolution is just a theory. (“Theory” has a stronger meaning in scientific fields than in general usage; it is better to say that evolution is just a hypothesis or one model to explain the untestable past.)
  2. Microevolution is true but not macroevolution. (People usually mean that we see changes within a kind but not between kinds; however, the important distinction is that we observe changes that do not increase the genetic information in an organism.)
  3. There was a water vapor canopy surrounding earth before the Flood.
  4. Mitochondrial Eve is only 6000 years old.
  5. The Gospel is in the stars.
  6. The Japanese trawler Zuiyo Maru caught a dead plesiosaur near New Zealand. (Later research showed it to be a basking shark.)
  7. The earth’s axis was vertical before the Flood. (Genesis 1:14 reveals seasons did exist prior to the Flood.)
  8. Paluxy tracks prove that humans and dinosaurs co-existed.
  9. Stars are closer than we are lead to believe.
  10. There was no rain before the Flood. (Genesis 2:4–6, a passage commonly used to support this, is speaking of Creation Week, prior to the creation of man. It may not be wise to assume this projects into the future until the Flood.)
  11. The speed of light has decreased over time.
  12. “There are no transitional forms.” (It would be better to say intermediates between two different kinds. We find variant transitional fossils for animals within the same kind—horse to a horse for example but that is expected in a biblcial worldview.)
hahaha it fun to see ham wriggle.
 
Common misconceptions/misunderstandings
  1. Earth’s division in the days of Peleg (Genesis 10:25) refers to catastrophic splitting of the continents. (How could the mountains of Ararat in Genesis 8:4 have existed on Day 150 of the Flood for the Ark to land in, if the Eurasian, African, and Arabian plates had not collided to form these mountains yet?)
  2. The Septuagint records the correct Genesis chronology. (Methuselah would have lived 17 years after the Flood without being on the Ark. This is a problem.)
  3. The phrase “science falsely so called” in 1 Timothy 6:20 (KJV) refers to evolution.
  4. Man could only live to 120 years as per Genesis 6:3. (Then how could many of Noah’s descendants outlive 120 years, including Abraham? This makes better sense as a countdown to the Flood.)
  5. The Intelligent Design Movement is a Christian movement.
  6. Women have one more rib than men.
  7. Archaeopteryx is a fraud.
  8. The Geneva Bible Society used Voltaire’s house to produce Bibles. (This has never been verified.)
well lnow you know bigdog and the rest.
Ken Ham says NO to these arguments.


This website is powered by Plexpedia
Usage of this site constitutes agreement to the » Legal Stuff