"Just another example of the sick humanist mind, Racism is just one aspect."
coming form the guy whos holy book tells him it's ok to beat slaves witha rod, that is if they don't die in the next 2 days after the beating...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGwfHxLkYK4&feature=related
but not only that.
it was a BLACK clergy man who objected to Ota..NOT because he was a christian. BUT BECAUSE HE THOUGHT IS WAS RACIST.
"Other evolution based thinkings are 'population control', 'bio
diversity', 'genocide / mass murder', 'sexual deviancy', 'animal
worship' & 'enviromental worship'. As well as others."
whihc all have to do with humaisn because?
"'population control"
and god killed all the first born egyptian babies.
"genocide / mass murder"
really, REALLY do i have to start slinging bible verses at you? ou know there are PLENTY of cases of this in the old testament. i don't know the exaxt munber of the verses but the first born example would be sufficient.
"sexual deviancy"
mmmm....i wonder with whom cian and abel slept? it's either their sister or their mother..isn't it? since adam and eve where their parents.
"animal worship"
which has what to do with humanism or atheism?
"enviromental worship'"
i know you're referring to environmental conservation..YES it IS important, we have to garantie our environment to or children.
"The agenda of the humanist mind and evolution is to;"
/conspiricy
"1) Create boundaries where there are none."
like don't bash people who are different then you.
"2) Destroy boundaries & laws long upheld and advocated."
like the right to keep slaves......
"I take comfort in knowing that I was divinely sanctictioned, designed
& made in the very image of the most high. My ancestors were all
human & my worth superceeds that of all creation."
now add this part:
"..and therefor i am alowed to do anything "
because you can claim ANYTHING is ok, when you're sanctioned by god.
"Evolutionists view humanities image as an accident."
well we ARE adapted to the enviroment we evolded in...which was the savannah.
"They view humanity as an insignificant, trivial and pointless conjur."
and we aren't another organism stuck on this rock and competing for resources, because....?
you're referrign to humanity as a species, not the abstract thing you're arguing for.
"1) Which is more important, the interests of humanity & his personal well-being or the interests of the bio diverse world?"
bio-diverse....do you even know what that means?
it simply means that the varyity in your species genepool.
larger variaty will increase species survival rate.
so you're commitign a fallcy here.
why?
because ur saying: humanities survival OR humanaties survival...
HOWEVER you go and to stretch the first option with :"is personal well-being"
which is contradictory as you're now referrign to an induvidual and NOT the species a s a whole (like your and your freidns children and grand children.
in which case i'll pick option 2
YES the survival of the entire species is more important then survival of one induvidual of that species.
Ironically bio-veresity in humans is an argument AGAINST the eugenics policies Hilter endorsed. so by bashing evolution, you're kinda saying Hitler was on the right tract....then again Hitler als though he was doing 'god's work".....
bunny how i did NOT invoke godwins law and yet STILL screw you over wiht hitler.
"2) What designates worth & signifiacance?'
for whom? me or all of humaity?
specify that question and then i'll answer it.
"3) Which has more of a right to live, MAN or DOG?"
you're going to start and anti hippy, vegan and PETA rant here aren't you?
MAN. because i am human. and the niches will be filled by different predators.
"4) Which is more important, the individual independence or the community coorperation for well being?"
community cooperation, I'm not gonna build a spaceshuttel by myself.
but this question is a paradox. as these aren't two opposite things.
dependign on the circumstances both can be viable option. like...when you ARE alone. then you'll need your independence.
and you can have independant induviduals working in community cooperation.
"Does man have the right to hunt stupid animals (that being all animals)?"
does a lion have the right to hunt deer? (rethorical)
your question is so asinine it makes my brain hurt.
if you REALLY think this is what acceptence of ToE (theory of evolution) predicts....you are stupid as hell...
"Does man have the right to use and, sometimes, abuse other life forms and the enviroment for his well being?"
personally i don't care, as we do it ALL THE TIME anyway.
our entire gut is comprised of mutualistic symbiosis.
EG; bacteria are handy cell "factories" we can GM into genses for the production of chemicals (like insulin)
but you're referrign to cows aren't yoU?
the bioindustry is a large polluter of the enviroment.
we need to cut down in meat consumption (like for health reasons) and start to manage the pollutants output of the bioindustry. but NO i don't say we should stop eatign meat.
" When, do you suspect, will man reach a complete evolutionary change?"
AUUUUUUW MY BRAIN. IT BURNNNNNSSS!
there's your supidity again.
every new generation is an evolutionary change over the previous. you just redefined the words to mean "large morphological change", whihc THEY DO NOT MEAN.
true, humans are less suseptable to most form of natural selection due to our ability to manipulate the environment. but we are still quite suseptable to things like.......flue pandemics?
the human physique won't alter much i think, most tweaks will be biochemical (which can still be enormous) and we'll TWEAK IT OURSELVES IF IT's UP TO ME!
althoug i'm not excluding a increased brain capacity and less well developed legs, WAY into the future, when we become so dependant on technology that we will barely to any physical labour at all.
but hey, the future is uncertain....who knows what will happen.
