Home > Content > General > Document: Young universe?
Young universe?
5 Comments - 1101 Views
Submitted By doctorofscience on 09/03/22
FreeHovind, doctorofscience, General 

Creationists often claim that radiometric dating is unreliable, fraught with error, etc - and is therefore provides no proof that the Earth is older than 6,000 years.
 
On the other hand, the methods that astronomers use to measure the distance between us and distant stars, galaxies, etc, are known with a fairly high degree of mathematical precision. Partly because they can be based on direct observation - and partly because of the distances involved (which are literally astronomical).
 
Those findings indicate that the universe is several billion years old - and while that may not prove the Earth's age, it at least sets a lower limit on the age of the universe.
 
I'm curious what the young-Earth creationist explanation for this is? Why would God create the universe, then wait the better part of 18 billion years before creating us?

» Reply to Comment
Re: Young universe?
4 days - 5,621v
Posted 2009/03/22 - 5:36 GMT

Good question and I'll research both sides later sometime. One thing I know is that people get light years confused with time. Light years represent distance. but atleast you admit there is no HARD evidence for an old earth.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Young universe?
1 day - 1,877v
Posted 2009/03/22 - 6:28 GMT
Actually light years, in the case of anything traveling at the speed of light, represents time as well as distance....well...if the universe is static...which it isn't...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Young universe?
1 day - 1,877v
Posted 2009/03/22 - 6:30 GMT
There is an ASSLOAD of evidence regarding the age of the earth.  Seriously...you can't make something true simply by constant reiteration.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Young universe?
5 days - 8,032v
Posted 2009/03/22 - 10:30 GMT
ehm bigdog. he is taking a hypothetical (not really his, but for the sake of the discussion) selective standpoint.
what he's saying is: "ok, lets ignore all the evidence of an old earth. in fact, lets ignore that entire discussion. instead lets talk about the evidence for an old universe."
 
what he is doing is temporarily just accepting your standpoint, but then pointing out that then there is STILL all this evidence for an old universe.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Young universe?
3 days - 4,501v
Posted 2009/03/22 - 15:17 GMT
Good question and I'll research both sides later sometime.
 
Good starting points:
 
but atleast you admit there is no HARD evidence for an old earth.
 
....no. Just because there is more readily-available evidence of the universe's age doesn't mean that there is a lack of evidence for an old Earth.


This website is powered by Plexpedia
Usage of this site constitutes agreement to the » Legal Stuff