..........O_O......roflmoa.......

dude they voted on what status jesus would have... They obviously edited it to some extent. And it says COMPILED, not invented.

"The purpose of the council was to resolve disagreements arising from within the Church of Alexandria over the nature of Jesus in relationship to the Father; in particular, whether Jesus was the literal son of God or was he a figurative son, like the other "sons of God" in the Bible. St. Alexander of Alexandria and Athanasius took the first position; the popular presbyter Arius, from whom the term Arian controversy comes, took the second. The council decided against the Arians overwhelmingly (of the estimated 250–318 attendees, all but two voted against Arius[5])."

¨As for people thinking the Bible was put together by man in and around 300 a.d.¨

 

there was no bible before the council of niciae, in fact, the name alone sais it, bible comes from the word bibliorum, that´s latin. the entire pro-roman anti-jew stance of the new testament, a roman propoganda ploy.

 

¨You need to check your history!¨

 

yes, YOU DO!

 

¨Isreal has documents much older then that!¨

 

ya, and those aren´t the new testament.

that would be the old testament.

 

GJ at bible fail.

¨do the genes recieve new information for the code to create the new creature?¨

 

you understand that you share ALL basal cellular functionals with E coli right?

and that nearly all those genes arew homologous.

and that it´s the differences in expression of genes (somethign our filler DNA is used for) is an important factor that differates you from...lets say, a chimp.

 

do you have even the slightest idea how DNA works in a cell?

 

¨Good mutations = fairytale. Bad mutations are the rule and the species will not likely survive 10,000 years, as a result.¨

 

1/10^9 chance of a base mutation and a staggerign percentage of noncoding DNA.....riiiiiiiiight.

 

on top of that, NYLONASE.