These snide machinations are contemptible!
I don't think it was disinterest. Your response was very hard to understand. You started talking about footprints in the sand. This was a case of footprints in rock.
"What are ou talking about?"
The typical rebuttal for the pompous; A shrug of disinterest.
Let me repeat myself; It's garbage! Anybody that would believe the
half-human or "homo-erectus" jargon, and the million year policy is
willingly ignorant.
I am not sure what "million year policy" you are referring to. If you are saying that scientists will say something is a million years old because all testing says that then you are right. So the people that read and accept science are willingly ignorant and the ones that put their fingers in their ears and say "God did it" are not?
There is NOTHING to indicate that that foot print is a million years old or was a half-human (homo-erectus).
And by nothing you mean scientific testing? Has it once entered your minds that it could be a HUMAN or, in the very least, an ANIMAL?
Of course people think, how do we know it is not a fraud like the Pauxly footprints that Hovind liked to point to. BTW humans are animals, we went over that before.
Let me guess, nnnnooooooo. That would ruin the fun.
Yeah that is it. And people are atheist because they want to sin. :rolleyes:
