Hi Everyone!
As you may know, a while back a Hovind supporter posted a link to FreeHovind in the links section of the WikiPedia article on Kent Hovind. Quite a few people came from the link, and I have had several people contact me and say how thankful they were for the site who found FreeHovind on WikiPedia.
Recently, some of the WikiPedia editors decided FreeHovind was "useless", and removed the link.
I defended FreeHovind on WikiPedia, and as I write this the FreeHovind link has just been posted to the "Request For Comments" system of WikiPedia which is a part of the dispute resolution precess.
If you are a WikiPedia editor, or you feel strongly about the usefulness of FreeHovind, please join us in the WikiPedia FreeHovind duscission:
WikiPedia FreeHovind Discussion on the Kent Hovind Talk Page
Thanks!
-Aubrey
Well. One should always take Wikipedia with a healthy amount of caution and a critical eye. For instance, they are slanting historical records, and accept descriptions of vile, heinous activities that no one, no matter the age, should pollute their minds with. They inform about despicable fringes of lunacy in a matter-of-fact way, and so normalize wickedness. Also, since the site has so-called "jewish" controllers (just as google, myspace, and MyTube) they choose to put their own people in a positive light (e.g. neglecting to disclose the negative sides of Woody Allen's character) and to slander holocaust investigators. When a man like Ernst Zundel can be locked up for years in Canada, without a trial, just for investigating the holocaust story, that sort of implies that there's something fishy going on here...
Let the spirit of truth prevail,
Mattias